3/1/-13 Ocean Rise Slows, Earth Heals
The President said,” We will tell our children, this is when the rise of the oceans slowed and the earth began to heal”. Have the environmentalist considered the fact, that there are under sea volcanoes? When eruptions occur there is an enormous displacement of the ocean water. Do you suppose that when numerous eruptions take place, that it might possibly cause the oceans to rise? Many of the volcanoes do not break the surface, but when they do we call them islands, you know like Hawaii, where the president goes to play golf and swim.
“A thousand miles north of Antarctica
, in one of the most remote parts of the world, enormous surprises lurk beneath the surface. Near the South Sandwich Islands, a British territory that straddles the Southern Ocean and the south Atlantic, scientists found more than a dozen huge underwater volcanoes, some of which tower 2 miles above the ocean floor. Enormous Underwater Volcanoes Discovered Near Antarctica - Popular Mechanics“. There is an estimated 5000 active underwater volcanoes.
There are many rivers dumping enormous amounts of silt into the oceans. In my opinion, any time solids are put into water, the water level rises. Do you suppose the increase of large ships that are on the oceans, could cause a slight rise in the ocean levels.
Some believe that global warming causes the glaciers to melt, therefore taking the pressure off the earth causes volcanic action to take place. So the conclusion of the matter is, if man is causing the rise in the temperature of the earth, and the rise causes the glaciers to melt, therefore causing the volcanoes to erupt, the atmosphere will be filled with ash and block sunlight, which will cause the earth to cool. Problem solved without spending one dollar of tax payers money.
My fear is that the President’s solution to climate change, will be similar to his promise to cut the deficit in half in his first term. When he took office in 2009 the deficit was nine trillion, now it is over sixteen trillion. Nine trillion was unpatriotic, but sixteen trillion is not a problem. The President is not our major problem, it’s the people that think he is the answer to their problems. Socialism is insidious, it has the same results as the frog in the pan of water, with the heat slowly being increased. A little bit feels good, but by the time the realization sets in you have sold your birth right and freedom for a bowl of pottage.
Leave a Comment
anonymous on 2014-03-02 wrote: This awesome blog is without a doubt interesting additionally amusing. I have picked up a bunch of handy stuff out of this amazing blog. I’d love to come back over and over again. Thanks! 3610
anonymous on 2014-03-01 wrote: This blog is really entertaining as well as diverting. I have discovered helluva handy advices out of this source. I’d love to visit it every once in a while. Thanks! 4083
anonymous on 2014-01-01 wrote: Hey, you?re the goto expert. Thanks for haingng out here. 3808
anonymous on 2013-12-26 wrote: Needed to compose you a tiny note to finally thank you very much yet again for your personal splendid methods you have discussed above. It is strangely open-handed with people like you to provide publicly all that a number of people would have marketed as an electronic book to generate some bucks for their own end, primarily now that you could possibly have tried it if you ever wanted. These inspiring ideas likewise acted like a fantastic way to know that the rest have the same dreams really like my personal own to see a whole lot more concerning this problem. I’m sure there are thousands of more enjoyable times in the future for many who check out your blog. 3972
anonymous on 2013-09-14 wrote: This really answered my problem, thank you! 3468
Trish Mikolajczak on 2013-09-12 wrote: I simply want to mention I am newbie to blogs and really enjoyed you're web-site. Very likely I’m likely to bookmark your blog post . You definitely have superb well written articles. Thanks a bunch for sharing your website. 3426
Junghoon on 2013-06-16 wrote: I believe that mnkaind is not harming the planet, the environment, or humans. Why? The government is telling us it isn't really happening. That is, while their words say that fossil fuels are a threat to humanity, their actions say otherwise.Everything the government has done to save us from manmade fossil fuel emissions has been to preserve and perpetuate the use of fossil fuels:1. Government has not funded R&D to find an affordable, full time replacement for the fossil fuels it blames for causing the problem. It throws out token sums to give the illusion of funding R&D.2. Government has seriously subsidized part time energy solutions like wind, solar, and biofuels. Forget the vagaries of the wind. Forget that sun shines only half of the time, on a good day. Windmills and solar panels require fossil fuel energy for their full time, affordable backup. Ethanol requires continued use of fossil fuel, because it is used to dilute our gasoline. If fossil fuels could be replaced by a full time alternative energy source, the market for wind, solar, and biofuels would no longer exist. Yet the government is still keeping them going with taxpayer (and Chinese) money. The small reduction in fossil fuel usage will save neither the planet and nor humanity from the manmade climate change threat the government insists is real.3. Government is relentlessly trying to pass some flavor of Cap and Trade law. If/when passed, this means government will ration fossil fuel energy for manufacturers, rationing that will be insufficient to make all of the goods that consumers need to sustain our standard of living. Because the government isn't funding the R&D to replace fossil fuels, government can smugly tell manufacturers to switch to an alternative energy source, which doesn't exist. But government will give them an out. Government will magnanimously allow manufacturers to buy carbon credits to continue to burn fossil fuels. Of course this won't save the planet and humanity from manmade climate change, either. But it will create a $10 trillion per year carbon derivatives trading industry, which will be too big to fail until someone invents the alternative energy. Then, carbon derivatives will be worthless4. Government knows that windmills, solar panels, biofuels, and carbon trading all depend on mnkaind's continued use of fossil fuels. Government also knows that a solitary inventor, working in his garage workshop, and who may actually stumble upon the alternative energy technology we need, will collapse of the global economy. The poor inventor of this energy will undoubtedly die in a tragic accident of some form or another.5. If Cap and Trade restricts access to fossil fuels by manufacturers, the government (through the EPA) is similarly imposing regulatory restrictions on consumers. These regulations will force us all to make radical changes in our way of life as we know it.6. The economic costs of windmills, solar panels, biofuels, and every manufactured good we consume will cost us dearly. All costs are ultimately borne by the consumer. The government will get a huge piece of this action through taxation. The bottom line is that everything the government has done and plans to do will take wealth from consumers' pockets and be redistributed as the government sees fit. Knowing this, why would government WANT to find a full time alternative to fossil fuels?Despite what the government tells us, and because it is NOT funding R&D to find an affordable, full time energy source to replace fossil fuels, government hopes these actions will fool us into believing it must be done to save us from manmade climate change.How can the government save us from manmade climate change if they won't fund the R&D necessary to find a full time energy source to replace fossil fuels? This is not a credible government response to the dire climate change threat they tell us about. And this is why I do not believe that manmade climate change is harming the planet or is a threat to humanity. In the end, it’s all about money and power, hiding behind the banner of manmade climate change, and all made possible by consumers’ ignorance of the truth. 3544
Ethan Rodregez on 2013-05-09 wrote: Global warming, as you may already be on familiar terms with is the process that describes the earth?s temperature climb. This rise in heat is as of greenhouse grasses. Although international warming might not have a important collision on top of your life, it is likely to have a enormous and probably devastating collision lying on the lives of your children, their children, and future generations to come. For that reason, lots of educators are attractive the time to educate their students on universal warming. In fact, you may live astounded immediately how rapidly these lessons start. When it comes to comprehensive warming and schools, you will locate that international warming is being qualified by the side of a much former period. ,, 3317